The catalyst is the idea is innovation

 {Innovation} has nothing to do

{By the amount of spending on research and development}

But it is related:

1- {the extent of-understanding-life-people-}

2- The {extent-understanding-process-innovation-}.

..

-Steve Jobs

The catalyst is the idea is innovation. As for money without a stimulus without innovation, it is consumerist without production.

. .

But the reality of societies proves the invalidity of your kindness, my friend

Reality tells us that the rates of innovation in all societies without exception are rising with the high volume of spending on research, and that all nations that occupy the first places in the number of registered inventions are nations that devote huge budgets to research

..

Necessity is the mother of invention. This is conclusive evidence that innovation is a desire to find solutions to the situation. It is not necessary that there are laboratories or scientific methods, research tools and scientists.

Innovation needs an idea and belief that it is correct

Idea creation includes all areas of life, whether in research or marketing. Is innovation not included in the ability to market as well as in the ability to do research?

. .

Quite simply, Xerox has stopped the innovation process, and Jobs and Gates as a whole .. What is meant in the quote is to understand the innovation process and not the innovation itself .. Innovation means that the idea does not stop at a certain limit .. Rather, it must continue to progress .. This is what Xerox did not understand. From the innovation process.

You cannot ask a team of technical specialists to put forward a marketing plan, this is not their field, meaning that they cannot blame the technical team at Xerox because they did not succeed in marketing their product. Their job is to present new ideas and innovations, and the question of marketing these innovations lies with another team different from He was apparently weak and short-sighted.

The inability to convert an innovation or great idea into a product that is not faulty to the innovation or idea.

Benjamin Franklin developed the initial designs of simple electric motors since 1740, but the industrial use of such motors did not occur until more than two centuries later, so does this detract from Franklin's genius?

Sometimes when the innovation is so revolutionary and brilliant, the technological environment in the world is not prepared to absorb or accept it, and several centuries may pass before the world becomes able to absorb such innovation in the industrial structure.

Xerox invented graphical interfaces in the 1970's, when computers around the world were confined to major government institutions and for military or highly sensitive use, and generalizing these interfaces was not originally commercially viable.

All there is to it is that Bill Gates and Steve Jobs came at the right moment, that is, after nearly two decades, and wiped off this important invention and realized that the time was ripe to publish it.